‘What I find most curious about the transgender community is the juxtapositions their beliefs pose, on the one side, they expect us to believe you can change your gender, but conversely, they refer to themselves as “trans” sometimes even saying “trans male” or “trans female” as opposed to using the gender they apparently ‘assign’ with.

If they truly believed gender was interchangeable and that the trans community is heavily marginalized and is the victim of hatred, why oust themselves by adding trans as the suffix of their “gender identity” or by using their so-called pronouns in their social media bios? It doesn’t make sense.

After pondering this for a little while after struggling to sleep, I remembered that businesses now have diversity quotas;  this was apparently ‘racial eugenics’ when the US implemented the Immigration Quota Act of 1921 – the UK tried to do the same when British Conservative Enoch Powell campaigned for tighter controls and regulations around immigration which led Labour, who was in power between 1964 and 1970, to respond with the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1968. The aforementioned act amended the Commonwealth Immigration Act of 1962 which controlled immigration by all Commonwealth passport holders (except those who held UK passports), with the amendment being that control was now extended to those “without a parent or grandparent who was born in or was a citizen of the UK”. This was repealed in 1971 when Conservatives took back control. Back then, Labour saw immigration quotas as racist and fought against them every step of the way, but it’s okay now because it’s done under the guise of ‘diversity’, whereby the quotas favor those who are apparently ‘oppressed’ – a word that they use so lightly it has lost meaning and instead just publicly fortifies you’re a Gen Z Liberal snowflake who likes to play the victim.

The words ‘oppressed’ and ‘refugees’ have lost all meaning. To them, oppressed is someone whose great, great, great, great grandparents were slaves or just anyone in general who isn’t a white, straight male. But as I’ll re-emphasize, “you weren’t a slave, I wasn’t a slave owner.” To them, refugees are anyone from any country, when in reality, by definition, they are those who are fleeing conflict from their home country, not Albanians who aren’t currently at war – they are illegal immigrants.

The Equality Act 2010, though passed by the not-so-very Conservatives, is an act which aims to “make everyone equal”, the side of it I find quite notable to mention is their intention to “promote equality of opportunity”, because what they can’t seem to wrap their head around is that equal opportunity doesn’t always equate to equal outcome. People in life are not equal, everyone has different strengths and weaknesses, and we apply those strengths/weaknesses in our decision making. Perfect example, in a workplace you can’t have 50-50 male and female engineers, this is because the pool of female engineers is statistically lower with only 14.5% (2020) of all engineers being female. Logistical law further tells us that the bigger the pool of engineers, the more ‘good’ ones there are. Thus, to hire 50-50 male and female engineers, you would decrement the overall quality of work. This is why we should hire based on qualifications rather than race, skin color, gender, etc. Which is something the left states they believe in, but are too busy virtue signaling and taking the knee for something that happened hundreds of years ago to notice that they are hypocrites –  protesting over junkie physically-abusive criminals like George Floyd as it’s “another example of a black man being murdered by white police officers” only to stay completely oblivious to the fact that police officers are more likely to be killed by a black man than an unarmed black man is to be killed by a police officer.

Jordon Peterson is an expert in the above subject, and has pointed out many times that equal outcome is ultimately impossible. And whenever I talk about equal opportunity and equal outcome, I always like to refer to a quote by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, a Russian Novelist and one of the most famous Russian dissidents who was a heavily outspoken critic of communism, “human beings are born with different capacities, if they are free, they are not equal. And if they are equal, they are not free.”

But diversity laws favour those considered ‘minorities’ – POC (People of Colour), Muslims, Trans, Homosexuals, etc. The white, straight male, however, is considered ‘too normal’, which is why you’ll find the victim culture so prevalent in the current modern day world, especially within the West, many white people (especially Gen Z) feel they need some ‘diversity checkmarks’ in order to be considered a ‘good person’. Another example of this, is the amount of times a statue has been torn down or a street renamed as it offends someone on the left or even when I referred to an illegal as an “alien” (which by definition, is correct) the police turned up at my parent’s house. But trans and LGBT+ flags being painted on the road by the council will not be removed despite being offensive to Christians, leftists will not be investigated for calling me a Nazi, etc.

Before we continue to expose how the Equality Act 2010 is abused by the extremely tolerant left, let’s take a gander at how inclusive diversity-based laws have made employers more ‘inclusive’:

• When applying for a job at Virgin Atlantic they give you an “equal opportunities form” to fill in where they ask you what your ethnic group, religion and gender is. The form states, “we’re committed to bringing together a workforce that reflects the society we live in, creating an inclusive culture that supports diversity and inclusion, and allowing all colleagues to bring their whole services to work.”
• In 2018, a lawsuit was launched against Google for refusing to hire White and Asian men, with the plaintiff, Willberg, claiming, “for several quarters, Google would only hire people from historically underrepresented groups for technical positions. In one hiring round, the team was allegedly instructed to cancel all software engineering interviews with non-diverse applications below a certain experience level and to ‘purge entirely any applications by non-diverse employees from the hiring pipeline.’”  
• In February 2021, Coca-Cola was exposed for training employees to ‘be less white.’
• In 2021, An investment firm by the name of State Street Global Advisors told their hiring managers  ‘they need approval to hire white men in a diversity drive’, as they are “seeking to triple the number of black, Asian and other minority staff in senior roles by 2023, though they denied this of course.
• In August 2022, a teacher’s union in Minneapolis called for white teachers to be laid off first.
• In late October, 2022, West Chester University was exposed for hosting a course that teaches first-year students to resent white people. 

The list just goes on, in fact, if I were to highlight every instance of this, sadly we would be here all day. 

Moving on, there is a distinct difference between being transgender and being transexual. Transgender is an “an umbrella term used to describe people who have a gender identity that is different to the sex recorded at birth”, whereas a transexual is someone who has had “sex reassignment” surgery. To put it in layman’s terms, to be transgender, all you are required to do is say you identify as something you are not, however, to be transsexual – well you have to get your genitals mutilated. 

According to Groomers, Stonewall, there are roughly 600,000 trans people in the UK, it negates to mention whether they are transgender or transexual, so that’s all the information we’ve got to work with. Furthermore, a poll was launched by ResumeBuilder that showed 1 in 6 hiring managers were asked not to hire white males. So with that aforementioned fact, we can see that hiring managers are already making their decision based on diversity and not qualifications – this is discrimination based on skin colour! Shadism! Which even the left admits, is a form of racism! So why are they okay with it now? Well because it only affects those of ‘non-minority descent’.

So how is the diversity system being abused? Well, as outlined by the above points, diversity laws are designed to favor the ‘minority’ groups, and thus just putting a different sexuality or gender (than the one you were ‘assigned’ with at birth) on your CV is more likely to get you an interview or follow up with the specified company. As I also previously pointed out in the article, there is a huge difference between being transgender and being transexual – to recap, for one you can identify as whatever you want, and for the other you need to have sex reassignment surgery. So it’s literally as easy as identifying as something other than the gender you were ‘assigned at birth’ will help boost your portfolio.

The tolerant left who claim to hate segregation, racism and discrimination are now the ones enforcing it – oh the irony.

As I conclude this article, I also feel it worth noting that though I use the term ‘minority groups’ in the title, as admitted by the UK government recently, they are no longer the minority, but the majority, this is proven by the fact they want the use of the term ‘bame’ replaced the phrase ‘global majority’.